Skip to content
PILLARS
HomeRecent BillsActionsMore
ExploreElectionsPresidential ActionsPoliticiansTrending Bills
WatchlistSettingsProfile
HomeRecent BillsActionsMore
PILLARS

The bills, politicians, and elections that shape your life, in plain English.

Get the App
Our Receipts
Sources & MethodologyApp DetailsSend Feedback
Browse Bills
Bills That Became LawPassed the HousePassed the SenateBills by Topic
The Legal Stuff
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceContact Us
Find Us On
© 2026 Political Pillars Inc.Simplifying politics
S 3663
Recent Bills/S 3663

NDO Fairness Act of 2026

IntroducedJanuary 15, 2026
Introduced8 months ago
Intro
Senate
House
Pres
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Crime and Law Enforcement
More:Recently Introduced BillsSenate Bills
Why This Matters

This bill updates the rules for when the government can delay notifying customers or subscribers about warrants, orders, or subpoenas for electronic communications or remote computing records. It adds detailed court review steps, deadlines for customer notice when delays end, and annual reporting by the Department of Justice.

Who this affects
providers of electronic communications · customers and subscribers · government law enforcement agencies · federal courts
What changes is this bill making?
  1. 1Government agencies may ask a court to bar providers of electronic communications service or remote computing service from notifying anyone about a warrant, order, or subpoena under section 2703 for up to 1 year in child exploitation cases and up to 90 days in other investigations.
  2. 2Courts must issue written findings based on specific facts showing that notice would risk endangering safety, flight, evidence tampering, witness intimidation, or serious investigation delay. Orders must be narrowly tailored and use the least restrictive option.
  3. 3Agencies can seek 90-day extensions with the same written findings and must alert the court within 14 days if circumstances change materially.
  4. 4Providers or their attorneys can challenge nondisclosure orders in court, and any challenge stays disclosure until the challenge is resolved. Court decisions on these challenges are final and appealable.
  5. 5Providers may share order details only with those needed to comply, legal counsel, or others the court approves, and must inform recipients of the nondisclosure requirement.
  6. 6When a nondisclosure order expires, the government must notify the affected customer or subscriber within 5 business days by at least two methods, supply a copy of the warrant or order, and explain the nature of the inquiry and the right to request disclosed information within 180 days.
  7. 7Upon such a request, the government must provide the customer or subscriber with the disclosed information or a certification that none was disclosed, excluding illicit records or child pornography materials. Redactions are allowed only to protect ongoing investigations.
  8. 8Each year, the Attorney General must publish on the Department of Justice website a report for each federal judicial district detailing the number of delayed‐notice requests, orders granted or denied, media‐related cases, and resulting arrests, trials, and convictions.
Read the detailed summary

NDO Fairness Act of 2026 This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA). The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e. g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification. This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena. The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children. Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on NDO-related data, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Read full document
Bill Progress1 of 4
Bills must pass the House, Senate, and be signed by the President to become law.
Intro
Senate
House
Pres
IntroducedCurrentJan 15

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors
See all 6 sponsors
Senate
House
President

The President

Donald Trump
President
Awaiting Vote
Similar Bills
Senate Bill · S 4465
4 of 4 · Became Law
Extends Surveillance Law Deadline
A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
·Defense
House Bill · HR 6048
3 of 4 · Passed House
Increases Requirements for Government Secrecy Orders
NDO Fairness Act of 2025
·Technology
House Bill · HB 1058 (AR)
Failed
Stops Public Employees from Giving Inspection Warnings
To Amend The Law Concerning Ethics And Conflicts Of Interest For Public Officers And Employees; And To Prohibit Public Employees From Giving Advance Notice To Entities Of Required Inspections.
·Government